A panel of judges said today they would recommend removing veteran Marion County judge Grant Hawkins from the bench.
The matter now goes to the Indiana Supreme Court, as soon as next month.
The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications, which brought the charges against the Marion Superior Court judge, has 20 days to file a response to the judges' decision with the state high court.
After that filing, Hawkins has 20 days to file his response.
Hawkins' troubles stem from his mishandling of the case of Harold Buntin, which caused the man to sit in prison for nearly two years waiting to be cleared of a rape conviction after DNA evidence absolved him.
After Hawkins and his court commissioner realized the mistakes, Buntin still was not released for six weeks.
Did I miss something in that article? Oh yeah - nary a mention of the word DEMOCRAT in the article. Why? It's the left-wing Ryerson Rag that's why. Because if it were a Republican judge the article would read thus:
"A panel of judges said today they would recommend removing veteran REPUBLICAN Marion County judge [Name of Judge] from the bench.
The matter now goes to the Indiana Supreme Court, as soon as next month.
The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications, which brought the charges against the REPUBLICAN Marion Superior Court judge, has 20 days to file a response to the judges' decision with the state high court.
After that filing, The REPUBLICAN judge has 20 days to file his response.
The REPUBLICAN judge's troubles stem from a blatant miscarriage of justice of the case of a disaffected person, which caused the wrongly convicted man to sit in prison for nearly two years waiting to be cleared of a false rape conviction after DNA evidence absolved him.
Because the REPUBLICANS are a bunch of robe-wearing bigots.
Typical Rag.
1 comment:
God your stupid and paranoid. Maybe Democrat wasn't mentioned because oh I don't know IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING? Yeah that might have contributed to the reason why it wasn't mentioned. The respective political parties of Senators, Representatives, Presidents, Mayors and Govenors are typically mentioned. With judges it is rarely, if ever, included. Hell, political party isn't even mentioned on Indy.gov. And your "evidence" that his political party was left out only because he is a Democrat is that, let me get this straight, what a fictitious article about a fictious Republican judge would say, at least in your mind? That's a pretty piss poor argument you got yourself there buddy. I mean maybe if you had an example of a negative article about a Republican judge where it specifically mentioned that said judge was a Republican your argument wouldn't be utterly retarded. As it stands you are a moron.
Post a Comment